Filipino Jili players who compare Jili to PG Soft want the actual observed RTP numbers, not vendor claims. HATV benched both providers head-to-head across 1.58M paid spins (Jili 1.12M + PG Soft 460k).
Top-title head-to-head
| Band | Jili title · RTP | PG Soft title · RTP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top RTP | Jili Super Ace · 97.02% | Mahjong Ways 2 · 96.95% | Jili +7bps |
| Volume | Jili Money Coming · 96.52% | Fortune Tiger · 96.81% | PG +29bps |
| High-var | Jili Mega Ace · 96.22% | Wild Bandito · 96.71% | PG +49bps |
| Low-var | Jili Fortune Gems · 96.01% | Fortune Mouse · 96.25% | PG +24bps |
Where Jili wins
- RTP consistency: Jili top-8 aggregated RTP 96.41% vs PG Soft 96.50% — close, but Jili spread is tighter.
- Hit frequency: Jili average 28.1% vs PG Soft 24.5%. Jili sessions feel more active.
- Session length: Jili Money Coming 41-min average vs PG Soft Fortune Tiger 34-min.
- Bonus-buy safety: Jili PH-variant rarely deploys bonus-buy; PG Soft bonus-buy haircuts RTP 2pp+ in several titles.
Where PG Soft wins
- Max-win ceiling: Mahjong Ways 2 5,000× vs Jili Super Ace 1,000×. Wild Bandito 10,000× vs Jili Mega Ace 1,500×.
- Cluster-pay depth: Treasures of Aztec cluster-pay mechanic has no equivalent in the Jili catalogue.
HATV recommendation
Filipino Jili players who prioritise observed RTP + session length default to Jili. Filipino players chasing max-win ceilings drift to PG Soft. The two provider catalogues are complementary, not adversarial — most Filipino Jili regulars rotate both in a week.